![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1994. 32:
531-590 Copyright © 1994 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
4.3. Expected Mass of Population III Stars
In all these scenarios, an appreciable fraction of the Universe may go into
subgalactic clouds before galaxies themselves form. What happens to these
clouds? In some circumstances, one expects them to be disrupted by
collisions
with other clouds because the cooling time is too long for them to collapse
before coalescing. However, there is usually some mass range in which the
clouds survive. For example, the range is 106-1011
M in the
hierarchical
clustering scenario. In this case, they could face various possible
fates. They
might just turn into ordinary stars and form objects like globular
clusters. On
the other hand, the conditions of star formation could have been very
different at early times and several alternatives have been suggested.
Some people argue that the first stars could have been much smaller than
at present. Fairly general arguments suggest that the minimum fragment mass
could be as low as 0.007
M
(Low & Lynden-Bell 1976,
Rees 1976)
and it
is possible that conditions at early epochs - such as the enhanced formation
of molecular hydrogen
(Palla et al 1983,
Yoshii & Saio 1986,
Silk 1992)
- could allow the formation of even smaller objects. One might also
invoke the prevalence of high-pressure pregalactic cooling flows
(Ashman & Carr 1988,
Thomas & Fabian 1990),
analagous to the cluster flows observed at the present epoch
(Fabian et al 1984)
but on a smaller scale. This possibility is discussed
detail in Section 9.2.
Other people argue that the first stars could have been much larger than at present. For example, the fragment mass could be increased before metals formed because cooling would be less efficient (Silk 1977). There is also observational evidence that the IMF may become shallower as metallicity decreases (Terlevich 1985), thereby increasing the fraction of high mass stars. Another possibility is that the characteristic fragment mass could be increased by the effects of the microwave background (Kashlinsky & Rees 1983) or by the absence of substructure in the first bound clouds (Tohline 1980).
One could also get a mixture of small and large stars. For example, Cayrel (1987) has proposed that one gets the formation of massive exploding stars in the core of the cloud, followed by the formation of low mass stars where the gas swept up by the explosions encounters infalling gas. Kashlinsky & Rees (1983) have proposed a scheme in which angular momentum effects lead to a disk of small stars around a central very massive star. Salpeter & Wasserman (1993) have a scenario in which one gets clusters of neutron stars and asteroids.
In the baryon-dominated isocurvature scenario, with highly nonlinear
fluctuations on small scales, the collapse of the first overdense clouds
depends on the effects of radiation diffusion and trapping.
Hogan (1993)
finds that sufficiently
dense clouds collapse very early into black holes with a mass of at least
1 M,
while clouds below this critical density delay their collapse until
after recombination and may produce neutron star or brown dwarf
remnants. One of the attractions of this idea is that it allows a baryon
density parameter higher
than that indicated by Equation (3.1) because the nucleosynthetic
products in
the high density regions are locked up in the remnants, leaving the products
from the low density regions outside (cf
Gnedin et al 1994).
It is possible that the first clouds collapse directly to form supermassive black holes (Gnedin & Ostriker 1992). Usually clouds will be tidally spun up by their neighbors as they become gravitationally bound and the associated centrifugal effects then prevent direct collapse. However, just after recombination, Compton drag could prevent this tidal spin-up, especially if the gas becomes ionized or contains dust (Loeb 1993). More detailed numerical hydrodynamical studies of this situation have been presented by Umemura et al (1993), who allow for different ionization histories and for different ratios of baryonic to nonbaryonic density. For a fully ionized gas, the baryonic disk loses angular momentum very effectively and shrinks adiabatically. Even if rotation is important, one could still get a supermassive disk which slowly shrinks to form a black hole due to angular momentum transport by viscous effects (Loeb & Rasio 1993). One might even end up with a supermassive binary system.
While there is clearly considerable uncertainty as to the fate of the first bound clouds, our discussion indicates that they are likely to fragment into stars that are either larger or smaller than the ones forming today. Theorists merely disagree about the direction! One certainly needs the stars to be very different if they are to produce a lot of dark matter. One also requires the clouds to fragment very efficiently. Although this might seem rather unlikely, there are circumstances even in the present epoch where this occurs; for example, in starburst galaxies or cooling flows. This is also a natural outcome of the hierarchical explosion scenario (Carr & Ikeuchi 1985).
We note that there is no necessity for the Population III stars to form
before
galaxies. It is possible that the Population III clouds just remain in
purely gaseous form and become
Lyman- clouds
(Rees 1986),
in which case the
formation of the dark-matter-producing stars would need to be postponed
until the epoch of galaxy formation. Nevertheless, there is at least the
possibility
that the Population III stars were pregalactic, and this would have various
attractions. For example, it would permit the Universe to be reionized
at high redshifts
(Hartquist & Cameron 1977),
thereby hiding small-scale anisotropies in the microwave background
(Gouda & Sugiyama 1992),
and it might help to
explain why the intergalactic medium appears to be ionized back to redshifts
of at least 5
(Schneider et al 1991).
Pregalactic stars might also be invoked
to explain pregalactic enrichment
(Truran & Cameron 1971)
and the existence
of substantial heavy element abundances in intergalactic clouds at redshifts
above 3
(Steidel & Sargent 1988)
and in intracluster gas at low redshifts
(Hatsukade 1989).