UMN-TH-1913/00, TPI-MINN-00/35
astro-ph/0007081
Abstract. Of the light element abundances capable of testing standard big bang nucleosynthesis, only 4 He is measured with an accuracy of a few percent. Thus, it is imperative to establish a comprehensive technique for determining 4 He abundances and reliable estimates of the true systematic uncertainties. Helium abundance determinations in H II regions are made from the observations of several distinct He I emission lines and their strengths relative to H I emission lines. With the general availability of large format, linear CCD detectors, the accuracy of relative emission line ratios has improved to the point where several terms in the error budget which were assumed to be negligible may now be important. Here we investigate the estimation of errors in deriving and reporting nebular helium abundances from optical emission line spectra.
We first investigate the analysis of the H Balmer emission lines.
These lines can be used to determine the reddening of the spectrum,
but underlying stellar absorption needs to be accounted for. Using
a minimization routine, it is possible to solve simultaneously for
both reddening and underlying absorption, but, due to the degeneracy
of the sensitivities of the individual lines, a minimization routine
may underestimate the true errors in the solution. Monte Carlo
modeling allows for a better estimate of the errors in underlying
absorption and reddening which need to be propagated to all of
the data. The magnitude of the
2 in such a minimization
is important in judging the reliability of the derived solution.
We also point out
that comparing corrected Balmer line ratios to their theoretical
values provides a sensitive test of the propriety of the magnitude
of the errors of reported emission line strengths.
The derived 4 He abundance depends on the H I and He I
emissivities, the electron density, the electron temperature, the
presence of underlying stellar absorption,
and, in some cases, the optical depth in the He I emission lines.
Certain He I emission lines depend sensitively on some of these quantities.
Ideally, solutions in which all observable He I lines yield the
same answer for the derived He abundance are favored.
We examine several methods for such a "self-consistent" analysis to
obtain the 4 He abundance in low metallicity
HII regions, and
attempt to make a thorough assessment of the uncertainties
involved in such determinations.
We demonstrate that solving for physical parameters via a
minimization routine opens up the possibilities of incorrect
solutions if there are any systematic problems with even one
observed He I emission line. In many cases, minimizing with just
three lines (
5876,
4471, and
6678)
is competitive with adding more lines into a minimization
(and always provides a useful diagnostic). Underlying He I
absorption can be important at the level of reported uncertainties,
yet hard to detect. He I
4026 is shown to be a
sensitive diagnostic of underlying He I absorption, and we recommend adding
it in to minimization methods. We show that Monte-Carlo simulations
are necessary to reliably determine the uncertainties in
the physical parameters as well as the 4 He abundance
determined in minimization routines.
We also point out that the magnitude of the
2 is important
in judging the reliability of the derived solution and should be
reported in addition to the derived helium abundance.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
DETERMINATION OF PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
Measurements of Relative Emission Line Strengths and
Errors
Determination of Reddening and Underlying H I
Absorption from Balmer Lines
Electron Temperature Determinations from
Collisionally Excited Lines
Electron Density Determinations from Collisionally
Excited Lines
CONVERTING INDIVIDUAL HE I LINES INTO HE/H ABUNDANCES
He I and H I Emissivities
Collisional Enhancement of He I Emission Lines
The Effects of Underlying Stellar Absorption
He I Optical Depth Effects
Ionization Correction Factors
SELF-CONSISTENT METHODS FOR EXTRACTING THE
4 He ABUNDANCE
Using 3 Lines
Using 5 Lines
Using 6 Lines
TEST CASES AND EXAMPLES
Cases with no Systematic Errors
Cases with Systematic Errors in
I(
3889)
Cases with Systematic Errors in
I(
7065)
DISCUSSION
MONTE CARLO ESTIMATES OF REDDENING AND UNDERLYING
BALMER ABSORPTION
MONTE CARLO ESTIMATES OF REDDENING AND UNDERLYING BALMER
ABSORPTION IN REAL OBSERVATIONS
MONTE CARLO ESTIMATES OF SELF-CONSISTENT HELIUM LINE
RATIOS
REFERENCES
For a postscript version of the article, click here.