Published in ApJS, 132: 129-198, 2001
Abstract. We present wide-field imagery and photometry of 43
selected nearby galaxies of all morphological types at ultraviolet and
optical wavelengths. The ultraviolet (UV) images, in two broad bands at
1500 and 2500 Å, were obtained using the Ultraviolet Imaging
Telescope (UIT) during the Astro-1 Spacelab mission. The UV
images have ~ 3" resolution, and the comparison sets of
ground-based CCD images (in one or more of B, V, R,
and H
) have pixel scales and
fields of view closely matching the UV frames. The atlas consists of
multiband images and plots of UV/optical surface brightness and color
profiles. Other associated parameters, such as integrated photometry and
half-light radii, are tabulated. In an appendix, we discuss the
sensitivity of different wavebands to a galaxy's star formation history
in the form of "history weighting functions" and emphasize the
importance of UV observations as probes of evolution during the past
10-1000 Myr. We find that UV galaxy morphologies are usually
significantly different from visible band morphologies as a consequence
of spatially inhomogeneous stellar populations. Differences are quite
pronounced for systems in the middle range of Hubble types, Sa through
Sc, but less so for ellipticals or late-type disks. Normal ellipticals
and large spiral bulges are fainter and more compact in the UV. However,
they typically exhibit smooth UV profiles with far-UV/optical color
gradients which are larger than any at optical/IR wavelengths. The
far-UV light in these cases is probably produced by extreme horizontal
branch stars and their descendants in the dominant, low-mass, metal-rich
population. The cool stars in the large bulges of Sa and Sb spirals fade
in the UV while hot OB stars in their disks brighten, such that their
Hubble classifications become significantly later. In the far-UV,
early-type spirals often appear as peculiar, ringlike systems. In some
spiral disks, UV-bright structures closely outline the spiral pattern;
in others, the disks can be much more fragmented and chaotic than at
optical wavelengths. Contributions by bright active galactic nuclei
(AGNs) to the integrated UV light in our sample range from less than 10%
to nearly 100%. A number of systems have unusual UV-bright structures in
their inner disks, including rings, compact knots, and starburst nuclei,
which could easily dominate the UV light in high-redshift analogs. A
significant but variable fraction of the far-UV light in spiral disks is
diffuse rather than closely concentrated to star-forming regions. Dust
in normal spiral disks does not control UV morphologies, even in some
highly inclined disk systems. The heaviest extinction is apparently
confined to thin layers and the immediate vicinity of young H II
complexes; the UV light emerges from thicker star distributions, regions
evacuated of dust by photodestruction or winds, or by virtue of strong
dust clumpiness. Only in cases where the dust layers are disturbed does
dust appear to be a major factor in UV morphology. The UV-bright plume
of M82 indicates that dust scattering of UV photons can be important in
some cases. In a companion paper, we discuss far-UV data from the
Astro-2 mission and optical comparisons for another 35 galaxies,
emphasizing face-on spirals.
Key words: galaxies: evolution-galaxies: fundamental parameters-galaxies: photometry-galaxies: structure-ultraviolet: galaxies
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION FOR ULTRAVIOLET IMAGING OF
GALAXIES
Ultraviolet Probes of Galaxy Astrophysics
Ages and Metal Abundances of Stellar
Populations
Star Formation Histories for t < 1
Gyr
Cold Interstellar Material
Hot Interstellar Material
Nuclear Structures
Low Surface Brightness Systems
Applications to High-Redshift Galaxies
UV Imaging of Galaxies
OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
UIT Imaging
Ground-based Optical Imaging
DATA ANALYSIS AND ATLAS PRESENTATION
Sample Selection
Treatment of Images
Flux Calibration and Error Analysis
Image Atlas
Photometry
Length Scales and Light Concentration
COMMENTS ON INDIVIDUAL OBJECTS
Primary Objects
Secondary Objects
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
APPENDIX A: STAR FORMATION HISTORY WEIGHTING
FUNCTIONS
APPENDIX B: GROWTH CURVE PHOTOMETRY
REFERENCES
For a postscript version of the article, click here.